Articles from Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP has launched an urgent investigation into whether certain officers and directors of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE: UNH) failed to manage UnitedHealth Group in an acceptable manner, breaching their fiduciary duties to UnitedHealth Group, and whether UnitedHealth Group and its shareholders have suffered damages as a result. Attorney Joseph A. Pettigrew is heading the investigation—what shareholders need to know:

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP has launched an urgent investigation into whether certain officers and directors of PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ: PEP) failed to manage PepsiCo in an acceptable manner, breaching their fiduciary duties to PepsiCo, and whether PepsiCo and its shareholders have suffered damages as a result. Attorney Joseph A. Pettigrew is heading the investigation—what shareholders need to know:

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP has launched an urgent investigation into whether certain officers and directors of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (NYSE: OWL) failed to manage Blue Owl in an acceptable manner, breaching their fiduciary duties to Blue Owl, and whether Blue Owl and its shareholders have suffered damages as a result. Attorney Joseph A. Pettigrew is heading the investigation—what shareholders need to know:

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP has launched an urgent investigation into whether certain officers and directors of Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) failed to manage Reddit in an acceptable manner, breaching their fiduciary duties to Reddit, and whether Reddit and its shareholders have suffered damages as a result. Attorney Joseph A. Pettigrew is heading the investigation—what shareholders need to know:

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (“Bright Horizons”) (NYSE: BFAM) breached their fiduciary duties to Bright Horizons and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Corpay, Inc. (“Corpay”) (NYSE: CPAY) breached their fiduciary duties to Corpay and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of JetBlue Airways Corp. (“JetBlue”) (NASDAQ: JBLU) breached their fiduciary duties to JetBlue and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of IonQ, Inc. (“IonQ”) (NYSE: IONQ) breached their fiduciary duties to IonQ and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Navan, Inc. (“Navan” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: NAVN), and certain of the Company’s directors and officers, and the underwriters of Navan’s October 2025 initial public offering (“IPO”), alleging violations of §§11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. If you purchased Navan common stock pursuant to and/or traceable to the Company’s Registration Statement and Prospectus (collectively, the “Offering Documents”) issued in connection with the Company’s IPO, you are encouraged to contact Scott+Scott attorney Mandeep S. Minhas at (888) 398-9312 for more information.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants PomDoctor Ltd., Zhenyang Shi, Li Xu, Cogency Global, Joseph Stone Capital, LLC, and Marcum Asia CPAs, LLP (collectively, the “Defendants”). The action, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and captioned Louie v. PomDoctor Ltd. et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-01013, asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities, other than Defendants and their affiliates, who purchased PomDoctor Securities (“POM”) between October 9, 2025, and December 11, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and who were damaged thereby. The lead plaintiff deadline in this action is April 13, 2026.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Hyatt Hotels Corporation (“Hyatt”) (NYSE: H) breached their fiduciary duties to Hyatt and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman Sachs”) (NYSE: GS) breached their fiduciary duties to Goldman Sachs and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) (NYSE: AIG) breached their fiduciary duties to AIG and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Picard Medical Inc., Patrick NJ Schnegelsberg, Matt Schuster, Yuncai “Richard” Fang, Chris Hsieh, Westpark Capital, Inc., Sentinel Brokers Company, Inc., R.F. Lafferty & Co. Inc., American Trust Investments, and MaloneBailey, LLP (collectively, the “Defendants”). The action, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and captioned Louie v. Picard Medical, Inc. et al., Case No. 5:26-cv-01024, asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities, other than Defendants and their affiliates, who purchased Picard Medical Securities (“PMI”) between September 2, 2025, and October 31, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and who were damaged thereby. The lead plaintiff deadline in this action is April 13, 2026.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Ubiquiti Inc. (“Ubiquiti”) (NYSE: UI) breached their fiduciary duties to Ubiquiti and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of JetBlue Airways Corp. (“JetBlue”) (NASDAQ: JBLU) breached their fiduciary duties to JetBlue and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Corpay, Inc. (“Corpay”) (NYSE: CPAY) breached their fiduciary duties to Corpay and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of IonQ, Inc. (“IonQ”) (NYSE: IONQ) breached their fiduciary duties to IonQ and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (“Bright Horizons”) (NYSE: BFAM) breached their fiduciary duties to Bright Horizons and its shareholders.

The lead plaintiff deadline throughout the release dated February 6, 2026, should read April 13, 2026 (instead of April 6, 2026).

The lead plaintiff deadline throughout the release dated February 3, 2026, should read April 13, 2026 (instead of April 3, 2026).

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), a shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether Hub Group, Inc. (“Hub Group” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: HUBG) or certain of its officers and directors issued misleading and false statements and/or failed to disclose information material to investors in violation of federal securities laws.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Eli Lilly and Company (“Eli Lilly”) (NYSE: LLY) breached their fiduciary duties to Eli Lilly and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman Sachs”) (NYSE: GS) breached their fiduciary duties to Goldman Sachs and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) (NYSE: AIG) breached their fiduciary duties to AIG and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), a shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether Navan, Inc. (“Navan” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: NAVN) or certain of its officers and directors issued misleading and false statements and/or failed to disclose information material to investors in violation of federal securities laws.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Ubiquiti Inc. (“Ubiquiti”) (NYSE: UI) breached their fiduciary duties to Ubiquiti and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Eli Lilly and Company (“Eli Lilly”) (NYSE: LLY) breached their fiduciary duties to Eli Lilly and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), a shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (“Corcept” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: CORT) or certain of its officers and directors issued misleading and false statements and/or failed to disclose information material to investors in violation of federal securities laws.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Charming Medical, Limited; Kit Wong; Ching Man Cheung; Josephine Yan Yeung; Leut Ming Gung; Shu Tai Victor Yu; Cathay Securities Inc.; WWC, P.C.; And Cogency Global, Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants”).

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Charming Medical, Limited; Kit Wong; Ching Man Cheung; Josephine Yan Yeung; Leut Ming Gung; Shu Tai Victor Yu; Cathay Securities Inc.; WWC, P.C.; And Cogency Global, Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants”).

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the directors of Green Dot Corporation (“Green Dot”) (NYSE: GDOT) breached their fiduciary duties to Green Dot’s shareholders in approving a buyout by CommerceOne Financial Corporation (“CommerceOne”) and Smith Ventures, LLC (“Smith Ventures”) for inadequate consideration.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE: UHS) breached their fiduciary duties to Universal Health and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Jayud Global Logistics Limited, Xiaogang Geng, Alan Tan Khim Guan, Lin Bao, Mengmeng Hu, Freidman, LLP, and Marcum Asia CPAs, LLP (collectively, the “Defendants”).

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE: UHS) breached their fiduciary duties to Universal Health and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the directors of Green Dot Corporation (“Green Dot”) (NYSE: GDOT) breached their fiduciary duties to Green Dot’s shareholders in approving a buyout by CommerceOne Financial Corporation (“CommerceOne”) and Smith Ventures, LLC (“Smith Ventures”) for inadequate consideration.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Jayud Global Logistics Limited, Xiaogang Geng, Alan Tan Khim Guan, Lin Bao, Mengmeng Hu, Freidman, LLP, and Marcum Asia CPAs, LLP (collectively, the “Defendants”).

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“Bank of New York Mellon”) (NYSE: BK) breached their fiduciary duties to Bank of New York Mellon and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE: NFG) breached their fiduciary duties to National Fuel Gas Company and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“Bank of New York Mellon”) (NYSE: BK) breached their fiduciary duties to Bank of New York Mellon and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE: NFG) breached their fiduciary duties to National Fuel Gas Company and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the directors of WideOpenWest, Inc. (“WideOpenWest”) (NYSE: WOW) breached their fiduciary duties to WideOpenWest’s shareholders in approving a buyout by DigitalBridge Investments, LLC (“DigitalBridge”) and Crestview Partners (“Crestview”) for inadequate consideration.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP today filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of two California and Colorado residents against some of the nation’s leading banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citibank, U.S. Bank, PNC, and Truist.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed Martin”) (NYSE: LMT) breached their fiduciary duties to Lockheed Martin and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of MGP Ingredients, Inc. (“MGP Ingredients”) (NASDAQ: MGPI) breached their fiduciary duties to MGP Ingredients and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the directors of WideOpenWest, Inc. (“WideOpenWest”) (NYSE: WOW) breached their fiduciary duties to WideOpenWest’s shareholders in approving a buyout by DigitalBridge Investments, LLC (“DigitalBridge”) and Crestview Partners (“Crestview”) for inadequate consideration.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed Martin”) (NYSE: LMT) breached their fiduciary duties to Lockheed Martin and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of MGP Ingredients, Inc. (“MGP Ingredients”) (NASDAQ: MGPI) breached their fiduciary duties to MGP Ingredients and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of MediaAlpha, Inc. (“MediaAlpha”), sometimes d/b/a QuoteLab, LLC (“QuoteLab”) (NYSE: MAX) breached their fiduciary duties to MediaAlpha and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of MediaAlpha, Inc. (“MediaAlpha”), sometimes d/b/a QuoteLab, LLC (“QuoteLab”) (NYSE: MAX) breached their fiduciary duties to MediaAlpha and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a Nextera Energy Partners, LP (“XPLR” or the “Company”) (NYSE: XIFR), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired XPLR common units between September 27, 2023 and January 27, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: James Alvrus v. XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a Nextera Energy Partners, LP, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-01755.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against Western Asset Management Company, LLC (“WAMCO” or the “Company”), Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”), and Stephen Kenneth Leech, II (“Leech”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased and/or otherwise acquired shares of the “Western Asset US Core Bond Fund” mutual fund classes – Class I (ticker: “WATFX”), Class A (ticker: “WABAX”), Class C (ticker: “WABCX”), Class FI (ticker: “WAPIX”), Class IS (ticker: “WACSX”), and Class R (ticker: “WABRX”) – and the “Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund” mutual fund classes – Class A (ticker: “WAPAX”), Class C (ticker: “WAPCX”), Class C1 (ticker: “LWCPX”), Class FI (ticker: “WACIX”), Class R (ticker: “WAPRX”), Class I (ticker: “WACPX”), Class IS (ticker: “WAPSX”) – between January 1, 2021 and October 31, 2023, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: The Western PA Electrical Employees Insurance Trust Fund v. Western Asset Management Company, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-00937.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Compass Diversified Holdings (“Compass” or the “Company”) (NYSE: CODI), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Compass securities between March 1, 2023 and May 7, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: Kevin Tan. v. Compass Diversified Holdings, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-5777.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Kohl’s Corporation (“Kohl’s”) (NYSE: KSS), breached their fiduciary duties to Kohl’s and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether Intel Corporation (“Intel”), as well as the leadership of Mobileye Global Inc. (“Mobileye”) (NASDAQ: MBLY), breached their fiduciary duties to Mobileye and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One”) (NYSE: COF) breached their fiduciary duties to Capital One and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of AppLovin Corporation (“AppLovin”) (NASDAQ: APP) breached their fiduciary duties to AppLovin and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (“Acadia Healthcare”) (NASDAQ: ACHC) breached their fiduciary duties to Acadia Healthcare and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (“Reckitt” or the “Company”) (OTC: RBGLY), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Reckitt American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) between January 13, 2021, and July 28, 2024, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: Elevator Constructors Union Local No. 1 Annuity & 401(K) Fund v. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-4708.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Kohl’s Corporation (“Kohl’s”) (NYSE: KSS), breached their fiduciary duties to Kohl’s and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether Intel Corporation (“Intel”), as well as the leadership of Mobileye Global Inc. (“Mobileye”) (NASDAQ: MBLY), breached their fiduciary duties to Mobileye and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of AppLovin Corporation (“AppLovin”) (NASDAQ: APP) breached their fiduciary duties to AppLovin and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One”) (NYSE: COF) breached their fiduciary duties to Capital One and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (“Acadia Healthcare”) (NASDAQ: ACHC) breached their fiduciary duties to Acadia Healthcare and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. (“Treace Medical” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: TMCI), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Treace Medical securities between May 8, 2023, and May 7, 2024, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: McCluney v. Treace Medical Concepts, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-00390.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”) issues this corrected notice to clarify the deadline to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff in the securities class action against Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Actinium” or the “Company”) and other defendants. On March 27, 2025, Scott+Scott filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Actinium (NYSE American: ATNM), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Actinium securities between October 31, 2022, and August 2, 2024, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: Kohil v. Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02553. On March 27, 2025, Scott+Scott published a notice which inadvertently stated that the deadline to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff is May 26, 2025. Pursuant to the March 27, 2025 notice published in connection with the Action, however, under the Private Securities Litigation Report Act of 1995, investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Actinium securities during the Class Period may, no later than May 27, 2025, seek to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff for the Class. Any member of the proposed Class may seek to serve as Lead Plaintiff through counsel of their choice or may choose to do nothing and remain a member of the proposed Class.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Actinium” or the “Company”) (NYSE American: ATNM), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, “Defendants”). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Actinium securities between October 31, 2022, and August 2, 2024, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: Kohil v. Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02553.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP announces that Plaintiffs in the below-entitled action concerning Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) are releasing the following notice pursuant to an order of the Delaware Court of Chancery.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Doximity, Inc. (“Doximity”) (NYSE: DOCS) breached their fiduciary duties to Doximity and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk”) (NASDAQ: ADSK) breached their fiduciary duties to Autodesk and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk”) (NASDAQ: ADSK) breached their fiduciary duties to Autodesk and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Carvana Co. (“Carvana”) (NYSE: CVNA) breached their fiduciary duties to Carvana and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal”) (NASDAQ: PYPL) breached their fiduciary duties to PayPal and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of KKR & Co. Inc. (“KKR”) (NYSE: KKR) breached their fiduciary duties to KKR and its shareholders.

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), an international securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether the leadership of Carvana Co. (“Carvana”) (NYSE: CVNA) breached their fiduciary duties to Carvana and its shareholders.